In the internal combustion engines we've talked around so far, the pistons operate in parallel, with each cylinder aligned to the next and a separate piston in each one. But what if we could stick two pistons in one cylinder and coordinate their actions so that they face one another -- hence the term "opposed cylinder" -- but do not collide? Each of these cylinders would only take up half the length of the cylinder, so that it would only have to move half the distance of a cylinder in a standard engine, thus saving fuel yet still providing the same rotating effect on the crankshaft. And the crankshaft could pass through the center of the cylinder, perpendicular to the cylinder's long axis, so that both pistons could rotate the crankshaft as they moved in opposite directions. And they could pool their exhaust wastes in the center of the cylinder, so that the ends of the cylinder wouldn't have to be capped off to keep the noxious exhaust fumes from escaping before they needed to.
Wouldn't that be cool? You bet it would!
This is called an opposed piston, opposed cylinder (OPOC) engine. In the OPOC engine devised by Ecomotors for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (or DARPA, and yes this means that early applications are likely to be military), the two pistons in the single cylinder are effectively interlaced, with each one divided into two parts and moving inside one another in opposite directions creating the compression stroke, so that the opposing ends of one part of each piston are closing together and compressing the fuel air mixture between them while the opposing ends of the other are moving apart to admit air in the gap to create the intake stroke. Since these two strokes are simultaneous, the whole action of the pistons takes only two back and forth motions, thus making this a two-stroke engine instead of the more conventional four-stroke engine. And because these two pistons in one cylinder perform the work of the two pistons in two ordinary cylinders, they do only the work that normally goes on in one cylinder but apply two cylinders worth of motion to the crankshaft. This gives the OPOC engine a high power density -- that is, a high ratio of power to the mass of the engine itself.
And here's something that really makes Ecomotor's OPOC engine stand out from the crowd: It's modular. You can use one, two or even three of them joined together with a gear arrangement that's scalable, from a one-cylinder engine (which in normal engine terms is really a two cylinder engine) up to a three cylinder (equivalent to a six stroke engine) and beyond. Just keep hooking the cylinders together to make your engine bigger and more powerful. And an OPOC engine is mechanically much simpler than a standard internal combustion engine. In the standard arrangement, a complex and precisely timed series of linkages is required to make sure the intake and exhaust valves are open when needed. That means the engine has an incredibly small number of moving parts. For instance, in a conventional internal combustion cylinder, a complicated mechanism is necessary to time the intake valve and exhaust valve so that they are open only when needed and are never open simultaneously. But in the OPOC engine, these "valves" are simply holes in the side of the cylinder, which are covered and uncovered by the sliding of the pistons themselves, thus removing the need for a complicated mechanism to make them open and shut. Ecomotors estimates that the number of moving parts in its engine has been reduced from 385 to 62, meaning that there is one heck of a lot fewer parts that need servicing and can go bad.
The upshot is that OPOC engines are simpler and thus less likely to break down. They're also more efficient, lose less energy while operating, and -- because they do the work of two pistons with only one -- can produce much more power than a standard internal combustion engine for only a portion of the gas. Is this the engine of the future? Probably. At least until that nuclear fuel cell comes along.
Author's Note: How Opposed Piston Opposed Cylinder (OPOC) Engines Work
I'm not one of those guys who grew up with my head under the hood of a car taking the engine apart and putting it back together again just to see if I could do it. More likely you'd find me at the keyboard of a computer, programming in languages like BASIC and C, or writing books about why controlled fusion power was the energy source of the future. (I'm still waiting on that one.) But when I started writing about cars, it was only natural for me to gravitate toward writing about automotive technologies that were out on the bleeding edges, ways of powering and using cars that were so advanced, you'd think they might have driven straight out of a movie like Blade Runner or Minority Report. I don't know about you, but I get this tingly feeling up and down my spine when I learn about something that's new, exciting and does things in a way that people (in this case auto engineers) have never done them before.
Opposed piston-opposed cylinder (OPOC) engines may not sound as bleeding edge as, say, flying cars or 1981 DeLoreans with flux capacitors to help them travel through time, but by the time I finished researching this article I realized that they were every bit as exciting. (Okay, maybe not quite as exciting as that flux capacitor thing.) OPOC engines are the product of a lot of ingenious thought by brilliant engineers who weren't willing to accept that the way internal combustion engines have always been done is the only way that they can be done. Yes, OPOCs have been around for a long time -- the early prototypes of the OPOC engine go back to the 19th century -- but automotive engineers, with a little help from the military's cutting-edge research wing DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency), are finally getting their moment in the sun and nobody could be more excited than I am.
- Ecomotors International. "Clean, Efficient and Lightweight Propulsion Systems for a Better World." (March 7, 2012) http://www.ecomotors.com/technology
- DeMorro, Christopher. "OPOC Engine Is Smaller, Lighter, and 50% More Efficient Than Turbodiesels." Gas 2. (March 7, 2012) http://gas2.org/2011/02/02/opoc-engine-is-smaller-lighter-and-50-more-efficient-than-turbodiesels/
- Ecomotors International. "EcoMotors International's Opposed-Piston, Opposed-Cylinder Engine Promises to Revolutionize Commercial Vehicle Design with Powerful, Lightweight, Fuel Efficient, Low Emissions Engines." (March 7, 2012) http://www.ecomotors.com/ecomotors-internationals-opposed-piston-opposed-cylinder-engine-promises-revolutionize-commercial-ve\
- Popular Science. "EcoMotors OPOC Engine." (March 7, 2012) http://www.popsci.com/bown/2011/product/ecomotors-opoc-engine
- Ellzey, Curtis. "Opposed Piston-Opposed Cylinder Engine." (March 7, 2012) http://www.engineeringtv.com/video/Opposed-Piston-Opposed-Cylinder
- Hofbauer, Peter. "An Introduction to EcoMotors with Prof. Peter Hofbauer." (March 7, 2012) http://www.ecomotors.com/videos/introduction-ecomotors-prof-peter-hofbauer
- Mraz, Stephen J. "Scanning for Ideas: Opposed-piston, opposed-cylinder engine bumps up the power density." Machine Design. (March 7, 2012) http://machinedesign.com/article/scanning-for-ideas-opposed-piston-opposed-cylinder-engine-bumps-up-the-power-density-0504
- Samid, Sam Abuel. "5 Ways to Redesign the Internal Combustion Engine." Popular Mechanics. (March 7, 2012) http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/news/industry/5-alternative-engine-architectures#slide-1
- Wojdyla, Ben. J. "Six Prototype Engines to Get Your Brain Firing." Popular Mechanics. (March 7, 2012) http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/news/fuel-economy/6-prototype-engines-to-get-your-brain-firing?click=main_sr#slide-1